12 mayo, 2023
Upon coming in into lab, members finished created advised concur. People was basically sitting during the a computer and requested to accomplish good questionnaire, which included an assessment out of identity and you may questions determining personal lover compatibility. Such as the previous training, grandiose narcissism was examined for the Narcissistic Personality Catalog (NPI ? = .86, M = , SD = 7.20) and Big Four characteristics towards the Large Four List (BFI) . To possess neuroticism, ? = .82; M = 2.77, SD = 0.80; having extraversion, ? dating site Strapon singles only = .84, Yards = 3.46, SD = 0.72; having transparency to tackle, ? = .75, Yards = step 3.55, SD = 0.58; to have conscientiousness, ? = .76; Yards = step 3.67, SD = 0.56; and agreeableness, ? = .73, M = 3.97, SD = 0.51.
It questionnaire wasn’t employed for study as it try area of your protection story. Members was told that the suggestions it given is utilized to match him or her up with somebody to your campus having equivalent hobbies. In the long run, intercourse, decades, and you may matchmaking reputation had been reviewed.
Following the processes outlined from the Parker and you may Burkley , participants was indeed next shown a picture of a target private and you may informed that based on the earlier in the day answers, he has “equivalent appeal” with this particular address. The ladies seen a picture of the male target and also the guys seen a picture of a lady address. These photos was indeed pre-examined by an excellent ple for their quantity of elegance using a beneficial 10-part scale, such that step one = extremely unsightly and you will 10 = extremely glamorous. The mean get towards the male images is 6.62 (SD = 1.86) plus the indicate get for lady photo was 7.03 (SD = step one.29). Instance Parker and you will Burkley, we as well as requested members a series of questions about the fresh participant’s demand for the prospective, but our dependent parameters had been just the products which analyzed spouse poaching particularly. Solutions have been made toward 5-section bills in a way that 1 = most unlikely and you will 5 = more than likely. Things were a good) “How probably can you feel to follow this person getting a good relationship?” (Meters = 2.43, SD = step 1.28), and you will b) “Just how likely would you be and make aside with this personal?” (Yards = dos.38, SD = step 1.34). We as well as examined the brand new the amount to which the fresh new fellow member receive brand new address glamorous using good 5-area scale in a manner that step 1 = really unattractive and 5 = very glamorous (M = step three.76, SD = 1.15).
We basic based all the parameters prior to measuring analyses. We then computed correlations ranging from predictor/handle variables (the major Five variables) and you will lead variables, which are demonstrated for the Dining table six. Grandiose narcissism are synchronised that have an increased probability of making out toward target, although not having picking out the target glamorous otherwise pursuing the target having a love.
We then registered variables for the an excellent regression design; number 1 variables out-of participants’ relationships condition, target relationship reputation, intercourse, and you will NPI scores were inserted with the Step one (controlling getting Huge Five details), every several-ways interactions among number 1 details was in fact inserted with the Step two, the around three-means interactions one of primary variables was basically joined towards the Step 3, as well as the four-method communications one of number 1 details is registered toward Step 4. Due to the fact not one of the four-ways affairs attained statistical relevance, 3 analyses is advertised from inside the Dining table seven.
For getting the mark attractive, merely fundamental outcomes having intercourse and you may a good participants’ relationship condition were high. Boys was very likely to discover address attractive than simply women, and you can singles was basically very likely to find the address glamorous than just affixed someone. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a beneficial predictor of finding the prospective attractive generally (? = -.067, t = -0.913, p = .362) and grandiose narcissists did not look for attached aim much more glamorous than simply unattached purpose (? = -.052, t = -0.842, p = .401).