15 agosto, 2022
Content
Supporting metrics are those that a team may find useful to improve their DevSecOps platform. Each platform will assign responsibilities at the domain level and then the artifact level to ensure that individuals and organizations have clear understanding of who owns what. This document is not a framework describing any specific implementation. It describes the requirements that need to be met by any specific implementation before it can be considered a Standard GSA DevSecOps Platform.
Ops people should feel comfortable working with developers on development-specific issues, such as test-driven development or versioning. On the other hand, Devs should get seriously involved in operational issues and also seek to get input from Ops when developing new solutions. All this requires a significant cultural shift from the traditional approaches. In addition to regular status updates between teams, hold informal gatherings, such as lunches, and use online collaboration tools such as Slack or Microsoft Teams. Establish collaboration hubs for both projects and broader discussions that promote cross-pollination of expertise between groups. The excellent work from the people at Team Topologies provides a starting point for how Atlassian views the different DevOps team approaches.
Security issues become less expensive to fix when protective technology is identified and implemented early in the cycle. All required competencies to develop and manage products should be within the team. Attainment of comb-shaped competencies is preferred for all team members, as well as continuous knowledge sharing and collaboration. The focus on products over projects is one hallmark of digital transformation.
Beyond work scope, minimal hand-offs can also take the form of automated processes. Automating your development cycle ensures that moving things along is a seamless process, regardless if the next step is an action like an automated test or merge to main, or an actual human. Here at Atlassian, platform teams build services used by all of our products and are expected to provide documentation, support, and consultation for stream-aligned teams. Implementation of Type 1 requires significant organizational changes and a high level of competence in the management of the organization. Dev and Ops should have a clearly articulated, clear, and understandable common goal and DevOps team structure (for example, “Deliver reliable and frequent SOFTWARE changes”). Without a clear understanding of DevOps and how to properly implement it, a DevOps transformation is usually constrained to reorganizations or the latest tools.
The Security and Compliance Engineer is responsible for the overall security of the DevOps environment. The SCE closely works with the development teams to design and integrate security into the CI/CD pipeline, ensuring data integrity and security are not compromised at every stage of the product lifecycle. In addition, the SCE ensures that the products being developed are adhering to governing regulations and compliance standards. When culture is deeply rooted in an organization, resistance to change is a big bottleneck. As DevOps is not just a tool or a technology, it is important to see a top-down cultural shift across the organization. Teams should break down silos and find a common ground to seamlessly communicate and collaborate.
After acquiring the right talent, organize your teams across customer value streams. Provide the autonomy for each team to choose their tools and processes while not drifting away from a shared tool strategy and centralized visibility and monitoring. While many organizations focus on tools and technologies, people and culture are ignored. However, choosing the right people for the right tasks and inducing the DevOps culture across the organization delivers results in the long run. One of the major reasons why organizations fail when initiating a change is that culture is deeply rooted. Proper engagement with the team and influencing positivity across the organization is essential.
Management, developers and operations are all looking at the same scoreboard, all progressing toward the same goal, and everyone is on the same page. They’re also moving from waterfall-style project management to agile, kanban or scrum project management. Everyone sees what is being done, participates in active sessions where they exchange ideas, and if they see something that doesn’t make sense, they align to it or raise the red flag. Guide (code and/or document) to application owner access to logging, monitoring, and alerting services; use of the guide should suffice for an application owner to configure and manage their logs, monitoring, and alerts. The guide should also cover logging configuration for centralized security monitoring by SecOps. The decisions that would drive successful release should be codified in code.
A key benefit of DevSecOps is how quickly it manages newly identified security vulnerabilities. As DevSecOps integrates vulnerability scanning and patching into the release cycle, the ability to identify and patch common vulnerabilities and exposures is diminished. This limits the window a threat actor has to take advantage of vulnerabilities in public-facing production systems. Ensure the underlying infrastructure and platforms can effectively devops organization structure support the services through capacity and availability planning, monitoring, and optimization. Business System Teams who take full responsibility of the product lifecycle end-to-end, as well as managing business and end users. A DevOps team mindset differs from traditional IT or scrum teams as it is an engineering mindset geared towards optimizing both product delivery and product value to the customers throughout a product’s lifecycle.
If management does not demonstrate a strong commitment to security, there’s no real hope of the rank and file doing the same. Unless security is a clear mandate from the CEO down, it will be virtually impossible to build a culture that treats the topic with the seriousness it requires. Teams should have the authority to figure these issues out on their own, which in turn will bolster their camaraderie and improve culture. In many agile shops that have not also adopted DevSecOps practices and strategies, security remains an afterthought.
In an age of frequent data breaches and hackers who are constantly finding new ways to gain access to systems and devices, proactive IT teams have realized that security needs to be everyone’s job. It’s a combination of the development, operations and security functions that allows teams to assess and address potential threats at every stage of a project. We talked to James Stanger, CompTIA’s chief technology evangelist, to better understand what DevSecOps is, how it’s changing IT teams, and how pros can get the skills they need to work in this type of environment. Keep your existing development and IT operations teams intact, with a separate DevOps team that operates alongside and coordinates activities with them. With this approach, developers and engineers retain their identities and independence as you integrate DevOps into the overall organization.
Thus, almost three-quarters of all firms have accelerated their DevSecOps initiatives. Consequently, nearly a decade after the concept of DevSecOps first emerged, progress remains fairly slow. While Ian Buchanan has broad and deep experience with both Java and .NET, he is best known as a champion of lean and agile practices in large enterprises. Mature teams release multiple times per week, and in some cases, multiple times per day. In pursuit of this goal, mature teams should use continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) to ship features frequently.
The deploy phase is a good time for runtime verification tools like Osquery, Falco, and Tripwire, which extract information from a running system in order to determine whether it performs as expected. Organizations can also run chaos engineering principles by experimenting on a system to build confidence in the system’s capability to withstand turbulent conditions. Real-world events can be simulated, like servers that crash, hard drive failures, or severed network connections. Netflix is widely known for its Chaos Monkey tool, which exercises chaos engineering principles. Netflix also utilizes a Security Monkey tool that looks for violations or vulnerabilities in improperly configured infrastructure security groups and cuts any vulnerable servers.
See why organizations trust Splunk to help keep their digital systems secure and reliable. This gives stream-aligned teams time to acquire and evolve capabilities without taking time away from their primary goals. The enabling team seeks to primarily increase the autonomy of stream-aligned teams by growing their capabilities with a focus on problems, rather than solutions.
Not all platforms will have these metrics immediately available, but a fully mature environment typically will have all of these metrics. Explore the comprehensive IBM portfolio of integration, AI, and automation capabilities designed to deliver the ROI you need. Dig deeper into DevOps job titles, roles, and responsibilities, the next article in our DevOps Guide. However, the risk with small teams means that getting all the required expertise might be a challenge, and loss of a team member might significantly impair the team’s throughput. A general agreement is that team sizes should range between 5 and 12.
DevSecOps has hardly become a universal approach to development and security. Still, DevSecOps continues to look more and more like a corporate necessity. Threats are on the rise, and the damage caused by successful attacks is getting worse. According to a Digital Guardian study, the average cost of a single corporate data breach in 2019 was $8.2 million, or $242 per breached record. For healthcare companies, the cost per breached record is nearly twice that; these breaches can take nearly eight months to identify, and even longer to actually clean up.
DevSecOps isn’t the only line of defense against hackers and other malicious exploits, but it is a strong first line of defense. Too many organizations have paid the price of downplaying or ignoring the need for security. By leveraging DevSecOps, you can take another step to keep from joining their ranks. To maximize your chance of long-term success, it’s important to keep focused on building a culture that supports your DevSecOps team members. Your development team is unlikely to be well-versed in security protocols, and even if they are not the first line of defense, it’s important to get them up to speed. DevSecOps works best when everyone is cognizant of security principles and requirements.
Platform teams enable stream-aligned teams to deliver work with substantial autonomy. While the stream-aligned team maintains full ownership of building, running, and fixing an application in production, the platform team provides internal services that the stream-aligned team can use. Treat IT systems, applications and cybersecurity as part of a single interconnected system. Adopt systems analysis techniques to holistically analyze system performance, functionality and security.
The leader should ideally be a role model, show integrity, create a trustworthy environment and inspire others to follow that path. The Splunk platform removes the barriers between data and action, empowering observability, IT and security teams to ensure their organizations are secure, resilient and innovative. DevSecOps has become particularly important in recent years due to the increase in speed of code releases.
The main difference is that agile development methodologies (e.g. Scrum and Extreme Programming) have more to do with how development teams are structured and how developers create code. Agile methodologies result in iterative code changes at a faster cadence, necessitating automation and DevOps practices. Technically, DevOps practices and tooling can exist without agile development methodologies, but the reverse situation is less true. It’s often best to use an experimental approach to product evolution. Mature DevOps processes include automated testing to ensure quality code shipments. The overriding factor that separates IT and security teams is organizational misalignment; the two teams often report up through different management structures.